Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Perfume Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed January 6, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AA Compliance FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing LabelsKeyboard Navigation FailureForm Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online perfume retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on January 6, 2022. The plaintiff is represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

The complaint alleges various WCAG violations, including mislabeled home page/company logo, search button, phone icon link, and social media icons. Submenus for "Women", "Men", "Kids", and "Brands" were inaccessible with keyboard navigation, and product prices and descriptions were unlabeled. The e-commerce website also lacked prompting information for online forms, an accessibility notice or policy, and generally failed to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

This lawsuit highlights the legal imperative for online retailers to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, particularly those using screen reader software. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and the Rehabilitation Act can lead to declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney's fees, costs, and compensatory damages, underscoring the need for comprehensive accessibility policies and ongoing audits to mitigate significant legal and reputational risks for similar businesses.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online perfume retailer accused of?

The online perfume retailer is accused of having mislabeled elements such as the home page/company logo, search button, phone icon link, and social media icons. Additionally, submenus for categories like "Women", "Men", "Kids", and "Brands" were inaccessible via keyboard navigation, and product prices and descriptions were unlabeled. The website also lacked essential prompting information for online forms, an accessibility notice or policy, and failed to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZ

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal risk online retailers face if their websites are not accessible to disabled users. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and the Rehabilitation Act can result in demands for comprehensive website remediation, the establishment of accessibility policies, mandatory employee training, regular accessibility testing, and the potential for substantial legal fees, costs, and damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Perfume Retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer