ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: American Brasserie Operator
Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC
Case Summary
Plaintiff Windy Lucius, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, filed an ADA Title III lawsuit on February 22, 2022, in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, against an operator of a specialty restaurant. The complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile website is not fully accessible or independently usable by visually impaired consumers, preventing equal access to its goods and services.
The lawsuit specifically details violations including WCAG Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) due to unlabeled images in PDF menus, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) for inaccessible PDF content to screen readers, Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequences) as order summary contents are not announced, and Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text) where promotional images with text are not announced. Additional issues include Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) due to inaccessible pop-ups and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) concerning an inaccessible date picker, all preventing plaintiff from making reservations, ordering, or accessing menu information.
This case underscores the significant legal risks for businesses, particularly those in the hospitality industry, that fail to maintain mobile websites compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines. Operators of public accommodations offering goods and services digitally must proactively address accessibility barriers to avoid litigation, ensure equitable access for all users, and prevent claims of discrimination and irreparable harm.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this specialty restaurant's mobile website accused of?
The mobile website is accused of violations including Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) for unlabeled images in PDF menus, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) for inaccessible PDF content, Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequences) for unannounced order summary details, Guideline 1.4.5 (Images of Text) for unannounced promotional images, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus Order) for inaccessible pop-ups, and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) for an inaccessible date picker.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.
What legal risk does this create?
This case underscores the legal exposure for public accommodations that operate mobile websites failing to meet ADA Title III and WCAG accessibility standards. Businesses must ensure their digital platforms are fully usable by individuals with disabilities to mitigate the risk of litigation, claims of discrimination, and the need for costly remediation.