ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a restaurant hospitality group
Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC
Case Summary
Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on February 24, 2022, against a restaurant hospitality group.
The complaint alleges numerous violations of WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines, including a failure to provide text alternatives for non-text content (1.1.1), issues with information and relationships preventing reservations (1.3.1), and a lack of meaningful sequence in reservation pop-ups (1.3.2). Further allegations include improper use of images of text (1.4.5), disordered focus for keyboard navigation (2.4.3), unlabeled images and links (2.4.4), and a failure to provide accessible names for components (2.5.3). Additional non-compliance points include missing language change indicators (3.1.2), insufficient labels or instructions for form elements (3.3.2), and a general failure of elements to be built for accessibility in terms of name, role, and value (4.1.2).
This action highlights the significant legal risks faced by public accommodations that fail to ensure their digital platforms, such as mobile websites, are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses operating similar online restaurant services must proactively address WCAG compliance to avoid litigation, provide equal access to all patrons, and mitigate potential demands for injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and costs.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant hospitality group accused of?
The lawsuit alleges violations including a failure to provide text alternatives for non-text content (WCAG 1.1.1), issues with information and relationships for making reservations (WCAG 1.3.1), and a lack of meaningful sequence in reservation pop-ups (WCAG 1.3.2). Other cited violations include problems with images of text (WCAG 1.4.5), incorrect focus order (WCAG 2.4.3), unlabeled links and images (WCAG 2.4.4), and missing accessible names for components (WCAG 2.5.3).
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by Windy Lucius, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.
What legal risk does this create?
This lawsuit demonstrates the ongoing legal exposure for businesses, particularly those in the hospitality sector, that operate inaccessible mobile websites. It underscores the necessity for all public accommodations to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III and WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines to prevent similar discrimination claims and associated legal costs.