Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Beauty and Nail Salon Operator

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 1, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled UI ElementsKeyboard Navigation InaccessibilityMissing Image Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff Victor Ariza has filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on March 1, 2022, against a beauty and nail salon operator, alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act due to an inaccessible e-commerce website.

The complaint specifies numerous accessibility barriers on the defendant's website, including a mislabeled company logo/home button, submenus inaccessible via keyboard, unlabeled promotional images, improperly labeled shopping cart functions, inaccessible gift card price and order totals, a lack of notification for shopping cart item removal, unlabeled social media icons, and text not labeled for screen reader integration, preventing full use by blind and visually disabled individuals.

This case highlights the legal imperative for all businesses, especially those operating e-commerce platforms connected to physical locations, to ensure their digital presence adheres to accessibility standards like WCAG. Failure to provide effective communication and equal access to online services, such as gift card purchases or store information, can result in lawsuits, demand for injunctive relief, and claims for attorney's fees and litigation expenses under federal disability laws.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this beauty and nail salon operator accused of?

The website is alleged to have an unlabeled company logo/home button, inaccessible submenus via keyboard, unlabeled promotional images, improperly labeled shopping cart functions, inaccessible gift card price and order totals within the shopping cart, no notification upon item removal from the shopping cart, unlabeled social media icons, and text not labeled for screen reader integration.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Victor Ariza filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the ongoing risk for businesses whose websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, particularly those using screen reader software. Such non-compliance can lead to federal litigation, demands for injunctive relief, and significant legal costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Beauty and Nail Salon Ope.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer