Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Indian cuisine restaurant group

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 7, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AWCAG 2.1 AAWCAG 1.3.1 Info and RelationshipsWCAG 2.4.3 Focus OrderWCAG 3.3.2 Labels or InstructionsWCAG 4.1.2 Name Role ValueScreen Reader IncompatibilityADA Title III Mobile Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed a lawsuit against an Indian cuisine restaurant group in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida on March 7, 2022. The complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) by not being fully accessible to visually impaired consumers using screen reader software.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations. These include failures related to Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships), hindering reservation processes; Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order), leading to navigation skips and unannounced menu items; Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions), due to unlabeled interactive elements; and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value), causing interactive walkthroughs and images to be inaccessible to screen reader users.

This legal action highlights the critical importance for businesses, particularly those in the hospitality and food service industry offering online services, to ensure their digital platforms comply with ADA Title III. Failure to provide an accessible mobile website poses a significant legal risk, potentially leading to lawsuits and court-mandated remedies to eliminate discriminatory barriers for individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this Indian cuisine restaurant group accused of?

The restaurant group is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines, specifically 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) affecting reservations, 2.4.3 (Focus order) causing navigation issues, 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) due to unlabeled elements, and 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) for inaccessible interactive features.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit indicates that businesses, especially those in the hospitality sector, risk ADA Title III litigation if their mobile websites are not fully accessible to disabled users, requiring them to make necessary modifications to comply with accessibility standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an Indian cuisine restaur.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer