Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online footwear retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 14, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing or Misleading Alt TextInaccessible Product InformationWCAG 2.0 Level AA Violations

Case Summary

Plaintiff Victor Ariza, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., filed an Amended Complaint in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on May 3, 2022, against an online footwear retailer. The lawsuit alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to provide full and equal access to blind and visually disabled individuals who rely on screen reader software.

The complaint details numerous specific accessibility barriers encountered by the plaintiff, a self-identified tester. These alleged violations include inaccessible product prices, unlabeled product descriptions and details, unlabeled hours of operation, and keyboard navigation issues where the cursor becomes stuck on filter options. Furthermore, the quick view screen and shopping bag content (such as item name, price, availability, color, size, shipping, and total) are stated to be inaccessible, product images are mislabeled (e.g., "preview button" instead of descriptive text), shoe sizes are mislabeled (e.g., "Cap M" instead of "medium"), and general website text is improperly labeled, causing screen reader navigation failures. The plaintiff also noted the initial absence, and subsequent inadequacy, of an accessibility statement and a universal symbol for the disabled.

This litigation underscores the critical importance for e-commerce platforms, particularly those with a nexus to physical retail locations, to rigorously adhere to digital accessibility guidelines. Businesses in similar industries failing to ensure their websites are fully perceivable and navigable by all users, including those with disabilities, risk facing similar ADA Title III lawsuits, significant legal costs, and reputational damage for discriminatory online practices.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online footwear retailer accused of?

The online footwear retailer is accused of inaccessible product prices, unlabeled product descriptions and hours of operation, keyboard navigation failures (cursor getting stuck), inaccessible quick view and shopping bag details, mislabeled product images and shoe widths, improperly labeled text leading to screen reader navigation issues, and an inadequate accessibility statement.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Victor Ariza filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for e-commerce platforms that do not ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users, especially those using screen readers, potentially leading to similar ADA Title III claims and legal liabilities.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online footwear retail.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer