Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Active Wear Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 16, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA Non-ComplianceMissing Accessible Names/LabelsKeyboard Accessibility FailureIncorrect Labeling of Form ControlsScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on March 16, 2022, against an online active wear and accessories retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's website contains pervasive access barriers that prevent blind and visually disabled individuals from fully using its services, thereby violating the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit specifically details several WCAG violations, including improperly labeled text throughout the website that causes cursor skips, inaccessible product prices and colors when using a keyboard, mislabeled product size options (e.g., “cap S”, “cap M”, “cap L”), and unlabeled shopping cart details (price, subtotal, shipping, total) for screen readers. Furthermore, the "Contact Us" link, including hours of operation, telephone number, and address, is inaccessible, social media buttons are not properly labeled, and the site lacks the necessary prompting information for filling out online forms. An accessibility statement and widget were also found to be ineffective barriers, with the website failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

This federal complaint highlights the significant legal exposure for e-commerce platforms and online retailers that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses operating similar digital platforms face potential lawsuits, substantial legal fees, and the mandatory expense of remediation to bring their websites into compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online active wear retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of improperly labeled text, inaccessible product prices and colors via keyboard, mislabeled product size options, unlabeled shopping cart details for screen readers, inaccessible contact information, improperly labeled social media buttons, and lacking prompting information for online forms. The website also fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar businesses of facing lawsuits, incurring significant legal fees, and being mandated to remediate their websites to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Active Wear Ret.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer