Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Apparel and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 21, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

Mislabeled UI ElementsMissing Alt Text on GraphicsKeyboard Navigation BarriersScreen Reader IncompatibilityWCAG 2.0 Level AA

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on March 21, 2022, against an online retailer specializing in apparel, footwear, bags, and accessories.

The complaint alleges various digital accessibility barriers on the retailer's e-commerce websites, preventing blind and visually disabled users from full and equal access. Specific violations cited include a mislabeled home page/company logo button, product images mislabeled as “link,” inaccessible product names and prices, inaccessible prices within the shopping cart, and mislabeled social media links. Furthermore, the website reportedly lacks prompting information for online forms, and fails to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher, including the absence of alt-text for graphics and keyboard navigation support.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for apparel and accessories retailers whose websites do not provide effective communication and equal access for individuals with visual disabilities, underscoring the necessity for robust ADA compliance and adherence to WCAG standards to avoid similar litigation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page/company logo button, product images mislabeled as "link," inaccessible product names and prices, inaccessible prices within the shopping cart, and mislabeled social media links. The website also lacks prompting information for online forms, alt-text for graphics, and keyboard navigation support, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the significant legal exposure for online retailers who fail to ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III and requiring costly remediation and compliance efforts.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Apparel and Acc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer