Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 21, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled ButtonsMissing Alt TextInaccessible Form ElementsInaccessible Pricing Information

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an apparel and accessories retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 21, 2022. The complaint centers on the inaccessibility of the e-commerce website to blind and visually disabled individuals using screen reader software.

The lawsuit details several WCAG violations, including a mislabeled home page/company logo button, product images mislabeled as “link”, inaccessible product names and prices, inaccessible prices within the shopping cart, and mislabeled social media links. Additionally, the e-commerce website allegedly lacks proper prompting information for online forms and an accessibility notice or policy, preventing effective communication and full access for disabled users.

This legal action underscores the critical need for businesses, especially those with both a physical presence and an e-commerce website that functions as an extension of their services, to ensure their digital platforms adhere to ADA Title III and WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards. Failure to provide equal access for individuals with disabilities can lead to significant legal exposure and demands for injunctive relief, requiring extensive remediation efforts.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The specific violations include a mislabeled home page/company logo button, product images mislabeled as “link”, inaccessible product names and prices, inaccessible prices within the shopping cart, and mislabeled social media links. The e-commerce website also lacks prompting information for online forms and an accessibility notice or policy.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case indicates that businesses with e-commerce websites linked to physical stores must ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III and WCAG standards, or risk similar litigation for declaratory and injunctive relief.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and accessorie.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer