Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed March 22, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMislabeled IconsInaccessible SubmenusMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on March 22, 2022, against an online fashion retailer. The plaintiff, who is visually-impaired and legally blind, alleges the defendant's e-commerce website is not fully or equally accessible, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The complaint details several specific WCAG violations, including mislabeled icons such as "My Account," "Search," "Cart," and "Settings," which are all voiced as "button" by screen-reading software. Other issues include inaccessible subcategories within menus (e.g., Men's Jackets, Shirts, Trousers), product pictures lacking description labels (alt-text), and un-labeled item descriptions, details, materials, prices within product pages and the shopping cart. Furthermore, images on the store locations page are inaccessible, preventing the plaintiff from obtaining critical information.

This case highlights the legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce platforms that fail to implement accessible design and functionalities. Such failures can lead to ADA Title III lawsuits, demanding permanent injunctive relief to mandate website modifications, ensuring effective communication with individuals with disabilities, and potentially incurring significant attorneys' fees and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The online fashion retailer is accused of mislabeled icons (My Account, Search, Cart, Settings), inaccessible subcategories in menus, product pictures lacking description labels, un-labeled item descriptions, details, materials, and prices, a mislabeled "Setting" button for currency change, un-labeled product price and subtotal in the shopping cart, and inaccessible store location images without descriptions.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, and the plaintiff's law firm is ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit indicates that e-commerce businesses face significant legal exposure under ADA Title III if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to court-ordered injunctive relief for necessary modifications and financial penalties including attorneys' fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: online fashion retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer