ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Tennis Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online retailer of tennis sports equipment, apparel, and accessories. The complaint was filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on March 24, 2022, alleging that the defendant's website is inaccessible to visually impaired users.
The lawsuit details numerous WCAG violations, including mislabeled homepage buttons and links (such as search, shopping cart, favorite, and settings buttons), inaccessible product prices and grand total prices with keyboard navigation, and mislabeled buttons like "Quick View" and "Add to Compare" without descriptions. Further accessibility barriers include inaccessible selected product descriptions, size guide text, lack of labeling for out-of-stock products, absence of notification upon item removal from the shopping cart, and inaccessible contact information in the footer. The website also reportedly lacks prompting information for online forms and an accessibility notice or policy, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.
This case highlights the legal imperative for all businesses operating e-commerce platforms, particularly those with a physical store nexus, to ensure their digital properties are fully accessible. Companies in the retail sector risk similar lawsuits if their websites are not compliant with ADA Title III and Rehabilitation Act requirements, emphasizing the need for robust accessibility policies, regular audits, and proper implementation of auxiliary aids and services for disabled users.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online tennis equipment and apparel retailer accused of?
The retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page button, mislabeled search, shopping cart, favorite, and settings buttons, an inaccessible magnifying glass icon, inaccessible product and grand total prices for keyboard users, mislabeled Quick View, Login, and Add to Compare buttons, inaccessible selected product descriptions and size options, unlabeled out-of-stock products, no notification upon item removal from the cart, mislabeled social media links, inaccessible footer contact information, and failing to provide an accessibility notice or policy while not meeting WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
NELSON FERNANDEZ filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
What legal risk does this create?
This creates significant legal risk for other online retailers, demonstrating that websites with a nexus to physical stores must comply with ADA Title III digital accessibility requirements. Failure to provide equal access through comprehensive WCAG compliance can lead to lawsuits for injunctive relief and attorney's fees.