Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Trendy Restaurant's Mobile Site

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed April 25, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 Level A and AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt Text for ImagesIncorrect Focus Order / Keyboard NavigationInaccessible PDF Content

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed a lawsuit against an online platform for a trendy Argentinian-style restaurant in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida on April 25, 2022.

The complaint alleges several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations, including Guideline 1.1.1 Non-Text Content (unlabeled images, blank areas read aloud), Guideline 1.3.1 Info and Relationships (skipped/partially announced content in PDF menu), Guideline 2.4.3 Focus Order (focus not moving to popup, unlabeled image announced), Guideline 2.4.4 Link Purpose (unlabeled links, unclear ordering process), and Guideline 4.1.2 Name, Role, Value (elements not built for accessibility in PDF menu, content not announced).

This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses operating places of public accommodation, specifically trendy restaurants with mobile websites, emphasizing the necessity of ensuring their digital platforms are fully accessible to visually impaired individuals to comply with ADA Title III requirements and avoid similar litigation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant platform accused of?

The platform is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines, including Guideline 1.1.1 for Non-Text Content (unlabeled images, blank areas read aloud), Guideline 1.3.1 for Info and Relationships (skipped/partially announced PDF menu content), Guideline 2.4.3 for Focus Order (incorrect focus, unlabeled images), Guideline 2.4.4 for Link Purpose (unlabeled links, unclear ordering), and Guideline 4.1.2 for Name, Role, Value (inaccessible PDF menu elements).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a legal risk for other businesses, particularly trendy restaurants with mobile websites, that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to visually impaired individuals, potentially leading to ADA Title III litigation and demands for injunctive relief.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Trendy Restaurant's Mobil.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer