ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online auto parts retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on May 2, 2022. The complaint alleges that an online auto parts retailer's website is not fully accessible to visually disabled individuals, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act and the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances.
The lawsuit claims the website has pervasive access barriers, including text not labeled to integrate with screen readers, inaccessible contact information, product prices, sales, and sold-out statuses not labeled for screen readers, and inaccessible item names, car type/year, and Shop Pay information. Additionally, the shopping cart's item price and subtotal are not labeled for screen reader integration, and the website lacks prompting information for online forms. An "accessibility" statement and widget/plugin were also found to be ineffective.
This case highlights the significant legal risks faced by businesses, particularly online auto parts retailers, whose websites fail to adhere to digital accessibility standards. Such non-compliance can lead to federal and local discrimination lawsuits, demanding injunctive relief, compensatory damages, attorney's fees, and substantial modifications to digital platforms to ensure equal access for all users, including those with visual disabilities.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online auto parts retailer accused of?
The online auto parts retailer is accused of having text not labeled for screen reader integration, inaccessible contact information, unreadable prices and sale statuses for product listings, and unlabeled item names and Shop Pay details. The shopping cart also failed to integrate item prices and subtotals with screen readers, and accessibility features like statements and widgets were ineffective.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This lawsuit underscores the legal risk for any online auto parts retailer that operates a website inaccessible to visually disabled users. It exposes them to potential ADA Title III and local discrimination claims, requiring costly remediation, injunctive relief, and financial penalties, including attorney's fees and compensatory damages.