ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online clothing and accessories retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online clothing and accessories retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on May 2, 2022.
The complaint specifically alleges numerous WCAG violations, including product information (regular and sales prices) and size options not being properly labeled, product descriptions and material/care information lacking screen reader integration, and inaccessible size guide information. Furthermore, the ‘Contact Us’ page features inaccessible chat, telephone numbers, hours of operation, and mislabeled social media buttons. The website also reportedly suffers from unlabeled text causing screen reader navigation issues and an inaccessible 'coming soon' product notification. The site's online forms lack necessary prompting information for visually disabled users, and its 'accessibility' statement itself is inaccessible, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards or higher.
This action highlights the ongoing legal risks faced by online retailers and public accommodations whose digital platforms fail to provide full and equal access to individuals with visual disabilities. Businesses operating e-commerce websites with a nexus to physical stores are particularly vulnerable to litigation under ADA Title III and similar state/local codes if their digital properties are not compliant with established web accessibility guidelines, potentially leading to injunctive relief and attorney's fees.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing and accessories retailer accused of?
The retailer is accused of product information and size options not being properly labeled, product descriptions and care information lacking screen reader integration, an inaccessible size guide, and an inaccessible 'Contact Us' page with mislabeled social media buttons. The complaint also mentions unlabeled text causing navigation issues for screen readers, an inaccessible 'coming soon' notification, and online forms that lack necessary prompting information for visually disabled users.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case underscores the legal liability for online retailers and public accommodations if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled individuals. Failure to comply with web accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG 2.0 Level AA, can result in lawsuits seeking injunctive relief and attorney's fees under ADA Title III and related local codes.