Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 3, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA FailureMissing Alt Text on Images/BannersScreen Reader IncompatibilityUnlabeled Form Fields/ControlsADA Title III Website Compliance

Case Summary

VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., filed a federal lawsuit in the Southern District of Florida on May 3, 2022, against an online clothing and accessories retailer. The complaint also names LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A. as co-counsel for the plaintiff.

The lawsuit alleges that the retailer's website contains numerous accessibility barriers, preventing blind and visually disabled users from full and equal access under Title III of the ADA. Specific WCAG violations cited include unlabeled promotional banners and images, a mislabeled return-to-home button, unlabeled social media icons, unlabeled menu categories (Men, Kids, Accessories, Outlet), unlabeled product prices, unlabeled product descriptions and details, and unlabeled size options beyond small. The complaint further states that the website lacks an accessibility notice, policy, or contact information for disabled users and fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

This legal action underscores the critical importance for e-commerce businesses, particularly those with a nexus to physical stores, to ensure their digital platforms are fully compliant with ADA Title III. Such businesses face significant legal exposure if their websites create discriminatory barriers for users with visual disabilities, necessitating the provision of auxiliary aids and services like compatible screen reader software.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing and accessories retailer accused of?

The online clothing and accessories retailer is accused of having an inaccessible website with issues such as unlabeled promotional banners and images, a mislabeled return-to-home button, unlabeled social media icons, unlabeled menu categories, unlabeled product prices, unlabeled product descriptions/details, and unlabeled size options beyond small. The website also lacks an accessibility notice or policy and does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a legal risk for e-commerce businesses, particularly those operating with both an online presence and physical stores, emphasizing the need to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, comply with ADA Title III, and provide effective communication to avoid claims of discrimination and potential legal action.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing and Ac.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer