Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Fashion Jewelry and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 24, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Labels on Interactive ElementsInaccessible Content StructureKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff Victor Ariza filed a lawsuit against an online fashion jewelry and accessories retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida on May 24, 2022. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website, which serves as an extension of the physical stores, contains numerous accessibility barriers that deny visually disabled individuals equal access to goods, services, and information, in violation of ADA Title III.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG violations, including a mislabeled homepage link, unlabeled menu drop-down options, improperly labeled product pricing and details, a mislabeled shopping cart displaying "zero item," an inaccessible filter button, and unlabeled product images, names, and prices after selection. Furthermore, the shopping bag's item price, subtotal, delivery, sales tax, and order total were reportedly inaccessible, and there was no confirmation provided after removing a product from the shopping bag, indicating a failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

This litigation underscores the significant legal risks for online retailers and other businesses operating digital platforms that fail to comply with ADA Title III requirements for web accessibility. Companies must ensure their websites provide effective communication and equal access for individuals with disabilities to avoid potential lawsuits, costly injunctive relief, and reputational damage for discriminatory practices.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion jewelry and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including a mislabeled homepage link, unlabeled menu drop-down options, improperly labeled product pricing and details, a mislabeled shopping cart, an inaccessible filter button, unlabeled product images/names/prices after selection, inaccessible shopping bag item details, and a lack of confirmation for product removal, all contributing to a failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Victor Ariza, and he is represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk for online retailers and e-commerce platforms that do not maintain ADA-compliant websites, potentially leading to lawsuits alleging discrimination against individuals with visual disabilities and requiring expensive injunctive relief and attorney's fees to resolve.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Fashion Jewelry an.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer