Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Shoe and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed May 26, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMislabeled LinksInaccessible Form ElementsKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, an individual with visual disabilities, has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on May 26, 2022, against an online shoe and accessories retailer. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website fails to provide full and equal access to disabled users, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act.

The complaint details several critical WCAG violations on the e-commerce website, including inaccessible product descriptions, a mislabeled return to home page link, unlabeled product names and prices, inaccessible item prices and subtotals within the shopping cart, and inaccessible company telephone number and address on the contact us page. Furthermore, text throughout the website is not properly labeled, causing screen reader software to skip information and navigate to the nearest accessible link, button, or header, preventing effective communication.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risks for online retailers and other public accommodations whose websites are not accessible to individuals with visual disabilities. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to costly litigation, demands for injunctive relief requiring website remediation, and the payment of attorney's fees and litigation expenses.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online shoe and accessories retailer accused of?

The complaint alleges inaccessible product descriptions, a mislabeled return to home page link, unlabeled product names and prices, inaccessible item prices and subtotals in the shopping cart, inaccessible contact information, and unlabeled text causing navigation issues for screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal exposure for online businesses that do not ensure digital accessibility, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III for discriminatory practices against disabled individuals and requirements for costly website remediation to meet accessibility standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Shoe and Accessori.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer