ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Luxury Watch Retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed a federal lawsuit against a luxury watch retailer in the U.S. District Court, Southern District of Florida, on June 3, 2022. The complaint alleges that the retailer's website is inaccessible to visually disabled users, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act. Roderick V. Hannah, ESQ., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A. represent the plaintiff in this matter.
The lawsuit details several specific accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including mislabeled social media links and home page buttons, a "Contact Us" link that reads as individual letters, mislabeled address and telephone number information, the absence of a visible shopping cart icon after adding an item, and a lack of description for the telephone number in the upper right corner. The complaint further notes that the website lacks prompting information for online forms and an accessibility notice or policy, failing to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher.
This action highlights the ongoing legal risks for businesses operating online platforms that fail to provide equal access for individuals with disabilities. Companies with e-commerce websites, especially those that integrate with physical stores, must ensure their digital presence is fully compliant with ADA and Rehab Act standards, including offering effective communication and accessible features, or face potential litigation and costly injunctive relief.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this luxury watch retailer accused of?
The luxury watch retailer is accused of mislabeled social media links and home page buttons, a "Contact Us" link read as individual letters, mislabeled address and phone numbers, missing shopping cart icon visibility, and an undescribed phone number. The website also lacks prompting information for online forms and an accessibility notice or policy, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ES
, P.
and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case underscores the legal exposure for businesses whose websites are not fully accessible to disabled users, particularly those with an e-commerce component linked to physical stores. Such companies risk lawsuits under the ADA and Rehabilitation Act, necessitating compliance with accessibility standards like WCAG to avoid injunctive relief and legal fees.