ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff PEDRO VERGARA has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an apparel retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on June 14, 2022. The complaint, brought by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals who rely on screen reader software.
The complaint details numerous web accessibility barriers, including mislabeled home page buttons and company logos, promotional banners and images lacking screen reader integration, mislabeled filter and size options (e.g., "cap S," "cap M," "cap L"), inaccessible product prices, and mislabeled product images. Further issues include improperly labeled color and size options, inaccessible item names, prices, and subtotals within the shopping cart, and a contact page where the telephone number lacks proper description. The plaintiff also alleges the website fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, lacks a universal symbol for the disabled, and is missing alt-text for graphics, preventing keyboard navigation for all functions.
This litigation highlights the significant legal risks faced by online retailers whose websites fail to provide full and equal access to disabled users under the Americans with Disabilities Act. Businesses operating e-commerce platforms that serve as extensions or gateways to their physical stores must ensure their digital presence is compatible with assistive technologies like screen readers to avoid potential lawsuits, injunctive relief, and claims for attorney's fees, costs, and damages for disability discrimination.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this apparel retailer accused of?
This apparel retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations including mislabeled homepage buttons and logos, promotional banners and images lacking screen reader integration, mislabeled filter and size options, inaccessible product prices, and improperly labeled color and size options. The shopping cart's item names, prices, and subtotals are inaccessible, and the contact page's telephone number lacks proper description. The website also fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, lacks a universal disabled symbol, and misses alt-text for graphics, hindering keyboard navigation.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
This lawsuit was filed by PEDRO VERGARA, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
What legal risk does this create?
This case creates legal risk for similar businesses whose websites are not fully accessible to disabled users. It demonstrates that businesses can face lawsuits under ADA Title III for failing to provide equal access to their digital platforms, particularly when those platforms are connected to physical store operations. This can lead to demands for injunctive relief, policy changes, and financial liabilities including attorney's fees and costs.