Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online fashion and home goods retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 16, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Labels/Instructions (3.3.2)Error Identification (3.3.1)Bypass Blocks (2.4.1)Screen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Arantza Espinoza, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online fashion and home goods retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on June 16, 2022. The complaint seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, along with damages, alleging that the e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually impaired users.

The plaintiff, who is visually impaired and uses screen reader software, alleges that the website fails to meet WCAG 2.1 AA compliance standards. Specific violations include a lack of labels or instructions for user input (e.g., product prices and payment options not being audibly described), insufficient error identification (input errors not audibly described during checkout), and the absence of a skip to content mechanism, making navigation difficult for screen reader users.

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal risks for online fashion and home goods retailers and other e-commerce platforms that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses operating similar digital storefronts should proactively audit their platforms for WCAG compliance to mitigate potential legal challenges and avoid claims of discrimination under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion and home goods retailer accused of?

The online retailer is accused of failing to provide labels or instructions for user input (e.g., audibly describing product prices and payment options), not adequately describing input errors in an audible format during checkout, and lacking a skip to content mechanism to facilitate navigation for screen reader users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Arantza Espinoza filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal liability faced by e-commerce websites, particularly in the fashion and home goods sector, if their digital platforms are not accessible to disabled individuals. Non-compliant websites risk lawsuits alleging discrimination under the ADA and may be compelled to implement costly accessibility remedies.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online fashion and hom.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer