ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Retailer of Bicycles and Accessories
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on June 17, 2022, alleging violations of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) Title III and the Miami-Dade County Code of Ordinances against an online retailer of bicycles, clothing, and accessories.
The complaint details multiple accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including mislabeled elements such as the size chart ("s2"), the return to homepage button, and the website's header slideshow ("link load slide one load slide two load slide three"). Additionally, product size and color option buttons are mislabeled ("size dash button and color dash button"), color options beyond the first choice are inaccessible via keyboard, shopping cart notifications for item additions lack proper descriptions, the quantity button within the shopping cart is mislabeled ("number spinner one minimum zero maximum zero column four of five"), and there is no confirmation when an item is removed from the shopping cart. The site also lacks prompting information for online forms and an effective accessibility notice or policy.
This case underscores significant legal risks for businesses operating e-commerce websites that fail to comply with digital accessibility standards, particularly WCAG guidelines. Companies that do not provide full and equal access to their online platforms for individuals with visual disabilities risk similar litigation, potential injunctive relief, and financial penalties, highlighting the necessity of proactively addressing website accessibility to avoid discrimination claims and ensure compliance with federal and local disability laws.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online retailer accused of?
The e-commerce website is accused of having mislabeled size charts, return to homepage buttons, and header slideshow elements. Product size and color options are also mislabeled, with some color options inaccessible via keyboard. Further issues include improper descriptions for shopping cart notifications, mislabeled quantity buttons in the cart, and a lack of confirmation for item removal, alongside a general absence of an effective accessibility policy.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This lawsuit highlights the legal exposure for e-commerce websites that do not meet ADA Title III and local accessibility standards. Businesses face the risk of injunctions requiring website modifications, legal fees, costs, and potential damages if their digital platforms are not fully accessible to disabled users, particularly those relying on screen reader software.