Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed June 27, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

Screen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Product DescriptionsMislabeled ImagesUnlabeled Form FieldsWCAG 2.0 Level AA

Case Summary

Plaintiff Pedro Vergara filed an ADA Title III digital accessibility complaint against an online apparel and accessories retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on June 27, 2022. The lawsuit alleges that the retailer's website contains numerous access barriers preventing visually disabled individuals from full and equal access to its goods, services, privileges, and advantages.

The specific WCAG violations cited include product names lacking descriptions in carousels, mislabeled "shop category" images, unlabeled product color and size options preventing screen reader integration, unlabelled product details and prices, and mislabeled products in the "wear it with" section. Furthermore, the complaint states that the website lacks prompting information for online forms and an accessible "accessibility" statement, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

This case highlights the significant legal risk for similar businesses, particularly online retailers with a nexus to physical stores, that fail to provide accessible digital platforms. Non-compliance with ADA Title III can lead to demands for declaratory and injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorney's fees, emphasizing the critical need for comprehensive web accessibility policies and implementations.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of product names lacking descriptions in carousels, mislabeled "shop category" images, unlabeled product color and size options, missing product details and prices, mislabeled products in the "wear it with" section, and failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Pedro Vergara filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firms RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for online businesses if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to lawsuits for injunctive relief, compensatory damages, and attorney's fees under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online apparel and acc.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer