Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Apparel and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 12, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA Compliance FailureMislabeled Interactive ElementsMissing Descriptive LabelsInaccessible Information ArchitectureLack of Accessibility Policy

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit against an online apparel and accessories retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on July 12, 2022. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website contains access barriers that prevent free and full use by blind and visually disabled individuals using screen reader software.

The lawsuit specifies several WCAG violations, including a mislabeled home page button/company logo, inaccessible store location details (cities' names, addresses, phone numbers, emails), a mislabeled "Order Lookup" link, unlabeled product information (image, name, details, price, and color), mislabeled size options, and a mislabeled trash icon in the shopping cart. Furthermore, the website allegedly lacks an accessibility notice or policy and does not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher web accessibility standards.

This litigation highlights the significant legal risk for similar businesses that operate e-commerce websites without ensuring digital accessibility. It underscores the critical need for compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines to prevent discrimination against individuals with visual disabilities and to avoid potential lawsuits, demonstrating that the failure to provide an accessible online experience can lead to legal action and demands for injunctive relief.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page button/company logo, inaccessible store location details, a mislabeled "Order Lookup" link, unlabeled product information (image, name, details, price, color), mislabeled size options, and a mislabeled trash icon in the shopping cart. The website also lacks an accessibility notice and fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This case signifies a legal risk for other e-commerce businesses if their websites are not fully accessible to visually impaired users. It underscores the importance of conforming to WCAG standards, providing clear accessibility statements, and ensuring all interactive elements are properly labeled for screen reader compatibility to avoid ADA Title III violations.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Apparel and Access.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer