Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Luxury Goods Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 14, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAWCAG 2.0 AALabels or Instructions (3.3.2)No Keyboard Trap (2.1.2)Screen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA ESPINOZA filed a lawsuit against an online luxury goods retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 14, 2022, alleging violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act. The complaint details the plaintiff's visual impairment and reliance on screen reader software to access websites, which was hindered by the defendant's inaccessible e-commerce platform.

The complaint specifically alleges several WCAG 2.1 Standard 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions Level A) violations where labels or instructions are not provided when content requires user input, specifically concerning dialogue boxes for sign-up offers, promo codes, and shopping carts not being audibly described. Additionally, a WCAG 2.0 Standard 2.1.2 (No Keyboard Trap Level A) violation is cited, where keyboard focus cannot be moved away from a dialogue box without assistance, rendering navigation impossible for visually impaired users.

This lawsuit highlights significant legal risks for similar businesses, particularly e-commerce platforms that operate both physical and online stores, emphasizing the need for their digital platforms to be fully compliant with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines to ensure equal access for all users with disabilities, or face potential declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, and damages.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury goods retailer accused of?

The online luxury goods retailer is accused of WCAG 2.1 Standard 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions Level A) violations for lacking audible descriptions in various dialogue boxes (sign-up, promo codes, shopping cart) and a WCAG 2.0 Standard 2.1.2 (No Keyboard Trap Level A) violation for trapping keyboard focus within a dialogue box.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Arantza Espinoza filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal risk for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible under ADA Title III, especially regarding screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation, potentially leading to similar lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief and damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Luxury Goods Re.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer