Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online women's apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 20, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled UI ElementsKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Accessible Names/Labels

Case Summary

Nelson Fernandez, a visually impaired and physically disabled individual, has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 20, 2022, against an online women's apparel retailer. Represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., the plaintiff alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website contains numerous accessibility barriers that deny him and other disabled persons full and equal access to its online goods, services, and information, in violation of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Palm Beach County Code of Ordinances.

Specifically, the complaint highlights numerous access barriers, including mislabeled icons and buttons (cart, search, grid view, return to home page, product images, and pop-up close button), a submenu inaccessible via keyboard navigation, and inaccessible product details such as price, color, and size. Furthermore, the website allegedly fails to properly label text for screen reader integration, such as a 'no products found' message on brand pages, and provides an improperly described telephone number for assistance. The site is noted to be non-compliant with WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

This lawsuit underscores the critical importance for all online women's apparel retailers and similar businesses to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Failure to comply with ADA Title III and relevant accessibility guidelines, such as WCAG 2.0 Level AA, can lead to significant legal exposure, including demands for injunctive relief, damages, attorney's fees, and the costs associated with remediation to remove digital access barriers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online women's apparel retailer accused of?

This online apparel retailer is accused of various WCAG violations, including mislabeled cart, search, grid view, return to home page buttons, and product images; a pop-up close button mislabeled as 'times'; a submenu inaccessible via keyboard; inaccessible product details (price, color, sizes); an improperly described telephone number for assistance; and unlabeled text for screen reader integration, such as 'No products were found matching your selection' on brand links. The website generally fails to comply with WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by Nelson Fernandez. The law firms representing the plaintiff are Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for similar businesses, emphasizing that websites with a nexus to physical public accommodations must be accessible. Non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, damages, attorney's fees, and a mandate for website remediation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online women's apparel.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer