Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Cosmetics Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 21, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt Text on ImagesScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation IssuesUnannounced Element Content

Case Summary

Aishia Petersen, a visually-impaired individual, filed a lawsuit on July 21, 2022, in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division, against an online cosmetics retailer operating an e-commerce platform. The plaintiff is represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., and seeks permanent injunctive relief under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990, alleging that the defendant's website is not fully or equally accessible to blind or visually impaired consumers.

The complaint specifically alleges several accessibility barriers, including duplicate IDs where the same label is used on multiple images, unannounced prices preventing purchase completion, an inaccessible "Locate a Store" page that skips address information, banners and images lacking alternative text descriptions, and an unannounced checkout pop-up window lacking focus. These issues allegedly impede screen-reading software, denying the plaintiff full and equal enjoyment of the website's goods and services.

This legal action underscores the imperative for other online retailers and e-commerce platforms, particularly those functioning as an extension of physical stores, to rigorously ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users. Non-compliance with ADA Title III, especially regarding auxiliary aids and services for effective communication, presents significant legal and financial risks, including demands for injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online cosmetics retailer accused of?

The alleged violations include duplicate IDs on images, unannounced prices preventing purchase completion, an inaccessible "Locate a Store" page, banners and images missing alt-text descriptions, and an unannounced checkout pop-up window lacking focus.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Aishia Petersen filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create for similar e-commerce businesses?

This case highlights the legal risk of inaccessible websites for e-commerce businesses, emphasizing the need for full ADA Title III compliance to avoid lawsuits seeking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and other remedies for discrimination against disabled individuals.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Cosmetics Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer