Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online flower retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 27, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Image Alt TextInaccessible Forms and Buttons

Case Summary

Plaintiff NELSON FERNANDEZ has filed a lawsuit against an online flower retailer in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on July 27, 2022. The complaint alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website contains significant access barriers, preventing visually impaired individuals from fully accessing its services and information, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The alleged WCAG violations include a mislabeled home page/company logo button, a site phone number lacking proper description, an inaccessible submenu for keyboard navigation, inaccessible product size options, an inaccessible pop-up window for text sign-up, promotional slide show images lacking proper description, select size options beyond the first choice being inaccessible via keyboard, an unlabeled shopping cart notification, an inaccessible store address in the footer, and text information under recent reviews not being labeled for screen reader integration.

This litigation highlights the critical legal risks for online retailers and similar e-commerce platforms that fail to implement robust digital accessibility standards. Businesses in the retail sector must ensure their websites are fully compliant with the ADA to avoid potential lawsuits, ensure equal access for all users, and prevent continuous harm to disabled individuals.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online flower retailer accused of?

The online flower retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page/company logo button, an undescribed phone number, an inaccessible submenu for keyboard navigation, inaccessible product size options, an inaccessible pop-up window, promotional slide images lacking descriptions, inaccessible size options, an unlabeled shopping cart notification, an inaccessible store address in the footer, and unlabeled text for recent reviews for screen readers.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

NELSON FERNANDEZ filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

Online flower retailers and other e-commerce businesses that do not adhere to web accessibility standards risk facing similar legal challenges under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online flower retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer