Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed July 29, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AMissing Labels/InstructionsError Identification FailureKeyboard OperabilityADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff ARANTZA ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on July 29, 2022, against an online fashion retailer. The plaintiff, who is visually impaired, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible, preventing her from fully utilizing its services and purchasing merchandise.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including a failure to provide labels or instructions for user input (Standard 3.3.2), inadequate error identification when input errors occur (Standard 3.3.1), and content that is not operable via a keyboard interface (Standard 2.1.1), particularly impacting the selection of product sizes. These barriers allegedly deny visually impaired individuals equal access to the digital platform.

This action highlights the significant legal risk for online fashion retailers and similar e-commerce platforms that do not ensure their websites comply with ADA Title III requirements for public accommodations. Businesses with inaccessible websites may face lawsuits seeking declaratory and injunctive relief, as well as damages, to compel compliance and prevent discrimination against disabled users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of failing to provide labels or instructions for user input (WCAG 2.1 Standard 3.3.2 Level A), lacking proper error identification for input errors (WCAG 2.1 Standard 3.3.1 Level A), and having content that is not operable through a keyboard interface (WCAG 2.1 Standard 2.1.1 Level A).

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ARANTZA ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal vulnerability of online businesses under ADA Title III if their websites are not designed to be fully accessible to visually impaired users, potentially leading to lawsuits demanding injunctive relief and damages.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online fashion retaile.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer