Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fast Food Restaurant Chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 1, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityImproper Focus OrderUnlabeled Form Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff James Watson has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a fast food restaurant chain and its franchisor in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, with the complaint being entered on August 1, 2022.

The complaint alleges that the mobile website of the defendant fails to comply with WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines. Specific violations cited include Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) due to product images lacking meaningful labels, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) for unlabeled combo boxes, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order) where focus doesn't move to overlays, Guideline 2.4.4 (Link purpose) for unlabeled social media icons, Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) for unlabeled menu icons, and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) concerning unlabelled state images and non-clickable text on the locations page, all leading to screen reader incompatibility for visually impaired users.

This legal action underscores the significant risk for businesses, particularly in the food service industry, that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible under ADA Title III. Organizations with websites that do not meet established accessibility standards, especially for critical functions like menu viewing and online ordering, face potential litigation and demands for injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this fast food restaurant chain accused of?

The mobile website is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guidelines, specifically: Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) due to missing meaningful labels on product images, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) for unlabeled combo boxes, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order) where the focus does not move to an overlay, Guideline 2.4.4 (Link purpose) for unlabeled social media icons, Guideline 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) for unlabeled elements like the main menu icon, and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) for unlabelled state images and non-clickable text on the locations page.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff James Watson filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates legal risk for fast food restaurant chains and similar businesses that operate mobile websites without ensuring accessibility for visually impaired users, as non-compliance with ADA Title III and WCAG standards can lead to lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief and attorney's fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fast Food Restaurant Chai.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer