ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a coffee and cafe retailer
Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.
Case Summary
Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on August 15, 2022, alleging that an online coffee and cafe retailer's website discriminates against blind and visually disabled individuals.
The lawsuit alleges various WCAG violations, including a mislabeled home page button/company logo, product details (name, SKU, price, description) for specialty coffee gift baskets not labeled for screen readers, inaccessible size and option selections for coffee subscriptions when using a keyboard, unlabeled Shop Pay text for screen readers, and unintegrated shopping cart notifications. The complaint further states that the e-commerce website fails to meet Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.0 Level AA or higher, hindering access for visually impaired users.
This action highlights the substantial legal risk faced by similar online retailers and public accommodations that operate websites. Businesses, particularly those with e-commerce platforms linked to physical stores, must ensure their digital offerings comply with ADA Title III to avoid litigation, costly remediation, and legal fees. Proactive implementation of robust web accessibility policies and regular auditing against WCAG standards are crucial to prevent discrimination against disabled users.
Unlock Full Intelligence Report
Obtain the technical WCAG violation analysis, target metadata, and legal stakes for Case #.
Case Q&A
What specific WCAG violations is this online coffee and cafe retailer accused of?
The website is accused of having a mislabeled home page logo, product details for gift baskets not labeled for screen readers, inaccessible coffee subscription options via keyboard, unlabeled Shop Pay text for screen readers, and unintegrated shopping cart notifications. The website also fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.
Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?
The lawsuit was filed by VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES
, P.
and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.
What legal risk does this create?
This case demonstrates that online retailers must ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, or they risk federal lawsuits under ADA Title III, leading to court-ordered remediation and attorney's fees.