Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Apparel and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 26, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Form LabelsKeyboard Navigation FailureADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an apparel and accessories retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on August 26, 2022. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website, which serves as an extension of and gateway to the physical store, contains access barriers preventing blind and visually disabled individuals from full and equal access.

Specific WCAG violations alleged include an inaccessible "X" button on pop-up windows, a mislabeled return-to-home button, inaccessible product prices, and unlabeled "sold out" notifications for screen readers. The website also lacked prompting information for online forms, featured an inaccessible "accessibility" statement, and failed to integrate with screen reader software, thereby not meeting WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risk for businesses, particularly those in retail with a physical presence and an e-commerce website, if their digital platforms do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG accessibility guidelines. Similar businesses could face demands for injunctive relief, significant website modifications, and compensatory damages if their online services are not equally accessible to all users.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer's website is accused of having an inaccessible "X" button on pop-up windows, a mislabeled return-to-home button, inaccessible product prices, and unlabeled "sold out" notifications for screen readers. It also lacked prompting information for online forms for visually disabled users and did not meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for e-commerce platforms linked to physical stores under ADA Title III, as they must ensure their websites are fully accessible to disabled users. Non-compliance can lead to court-ordered injunctive relief, mandatory website changes, and financial compensation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Apparel and Accessorie.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer