Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a dental office website

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 29, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Alberto R. Leal, Esq., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextSemantic Structure FailureLogical Reading OrderMissing Page Titles

Case Summary

ANDRES GOMEZ has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on August 29, 2022, alleging that a dental office's website is inaccessible to blind and visually impaired consumers. The plaintiff claims that the website, which serves as an extension of the defendant's physical brick-and-mortar dental office, violates Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act by failing to provide equal access to its services and information.

The complaint specifically alleges several WCAG violations, including the lack of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, an incorrect reading sequence when content order affects meaning, the absence of page titles describing topic or purpose, images lacking screen reader explanations, and the absence of an accessibility policy statement on the website. These barriers purportedly prevent blind users from independently accessing vital information such as office locations, hours, and appointment requests.

This action highlights the ongoing legal risk for online businesses, particularly those with a physical nexus, to ensure their digital platforms are accessible to individuals with disabilities, or face similar injunctive relief mandates under ADA Title III. Businesses in related industries should review their digital accessibility to avoid potential litigation and ensure compliance with WCAG 2.1 AA standards.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this dental office accused of?

The alleged violations include missing text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey content meaning and structure beyond visual presentation, an incorrect reading sequence, absent web page titles, images not explained to screen reader users, and no website accessibility policy.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ANDRES GOMEZ filed this lawsuit, represented by Alberto R. Leal, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar businesses, especially those with a physical location linked to their website, to ensure their digital presence complies with ADA Title III and WCAG standards to avoid litigation.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a dental office website. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer