Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed August 30, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Descriptive Link TextImproper Form Element LabelingMissing Accessibility Statement

Case Summary

Plaintiff Victor Ariza, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A. and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an apparel and accessories retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on August 30, 2022. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website, which serves as an extension and gateway to its physical stores, contains pervasive access barriers that deny visually disabled individuals equal access.

The alleged WCAG violations include mislabeled links (such as those for other brands, the homepage logo, and product images) that lack descriptive text, improperly labeled size and quantity options presented as "cap S, cap M, and cap L" or "one button one combo box collapse," and a complete absence of an accessibility notice, statement, or policy on the website. These issues prevent effective screen reader use and lead to a general failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, thereby denying full and equal access to visually impaired users.

This legal action underscores the significant legal risks faced by online retailers under ADA Title III if their digital platforms are not accessible to individuals with disabilities. Businesses operating e-commerce websites linked to physical stores must ensure their sites adhere to established accessibility guidelines, provide clear accessibility policies, and implement features compatible with assistive technologies to mitigate exposure to similar lawsuits and costly injunctive relief.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The website is alleged to have mislabeled links and images lacking descriptive text, improperly labeled size and quantity options, and a general failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards. It also lacks an accessibility policy or statement.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Victor Ariza filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case highlights the legal risk for online apparel and accessories retailers whose websites are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to federal lawsuits, injunctions requiring website modifications, and awards for attorney's fees and costs under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and accessorie.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer