Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Fashion Clothing Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 2, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 1.1.1 Non-text ContentScreen Reader IncompatibilityHTML Validation ErrorsWCAG 1.4.1 Use of ColorADA Title III Website

Case Summary

Plaintiff Raymond T. Mahlberg, represented by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., filed a lawsuit against an online fashion clothing retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on September 2, 2022. The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, claiming the retailer's e-commerce website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers.

The complaint details specific accessibility barriers encountered by the visually impaired plaintiff using screen-reading software. These include product images mislabeled with "pid numbers" instead of descriptive alt text, prices being skipped and not announced, unlabeled fieldset elements, pop-up windows appearing without being announced by the screen reader, duplicate IDs leading to stuttering, and links lacking underlines, which impacts color-blind users.

This lawsuit underscores the legal imperative for digital platforms, especially e-commerce sites connected to physical stores, to comply with ADA Title III requirements for effective communication and equal access. Businesses in similar online retail sectors face considerable legal risk if their websites are not designed and maintained to be fully accessible to individuals with visual impairments and other disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion clothing retailer accused of?

The online fashion clothing retailer is accused of product images being mislabeled with "pid numbers" instead of descriptions, prices being skipped, unlabeled fieldset elements, pop-up windows not being announced, duplicate IDs causing screen readers to stutter, and removed link underlines making navigation difficult for color-blind users.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Raymond T. Mahlberg filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal risk for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to visually impaired users, potentially leading to lawsuits under ADA Title III for denial of equal access and effective communication.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Fashion Clothing R.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer