Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Dental Service

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 6, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Alberto R. Leal, Esq., P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt Text on Non-Text ElementsIncorrect Reading SequenceMissing Page TitlesLack of Accessibility Statement

Case Summary

Andres Gomez, represented by Alberto R. Leal, Esq., P.A., filed a lawsuit against an online dental service in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 6, 2022. The complaint alleges that the defendant's website contains significant digital barriers that prevent blind and visually impaired consumers from accessing its services, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit details several specific accessibility deficiencies, including the absence of text equivalents for non-text elements, failure to convey information about content meaning and structure non-visually, an incorrect reading sequence for content affecting its meaning, lack of descriptive web page titles, un-explained images for screen reader users, and the complete absence of an accessibility policy statement on the site. These alleged violations effectively deny the plaintiff equal access to goods and services offered by the digital platform.

This case underscores the substantial legal risk for businesses operating websites that serve as extensions of physical public accommodations if they fail to comply with digital accessibility standards like WCAG 2.0 AA or 2.1 AA. Companies that offer services, information, or appointment scheduling through an inaccessible online presence may face ADA Title III lawsuits, necessitating costly remediation efforts and policy changes to ensure equal access for individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online dental service accused of?

This online dental service is accused of lacking text equivalents for non-text elements, failing to convey content meaning and structure non-visually, having incorrect content reading sequences, missing web page titles, not explaining images for screen readers, and lacking an accessibility policy.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Andres Gomez filed this lawsuit, represented by Alberto R. Leal, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for businesses whose digital platforms are extensions of physical locations if they fail to provide accessible online services, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief to remediate digital barriers.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Dental Service. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer