Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and footwear retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 6, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A. and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing LabelsLack of Programmatic FeedbackKeyboard Navigation Failure

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on September 6, 2022, against an apparel and footwear retailer. The complaint alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act.

The lawsuit specifies multiple Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) violations, including a mislabeled top banner and home page logo, product details (such as price, item type, and colors) that are not properly labeled for screen reader integration, and the absence of confirmation for shopping cart actions. Furthermore, the website allegedly fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards and lacks an effective accessibility policy or the universal symbol for the disabled.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risks for similar businesses operating e-commerce platforms. Companies that do not ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with visual disabilities may face similar lawsuits, leading to potential injunctions, significant legal costs, and compensatory damages.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this apparel and footwear retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having a mislabeled top banner and home page logo, product details (price, item type, and colors) not labeled for screen reader integration, no confirmation for shopping cart actions, non-compliance with WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards, and the absence of an accessibility notice or the universal symbol for the disabled.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

and LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for similar businesses, particularly e-commerce platforms, that fail to ensure their websites are accessible to individuals with visual disabilities, potentially leading to injunctions, compensatory damages, and attorney's fees under ADA Title III.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and footwear r.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer