Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Luxury Jewelry Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 22, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt Text on Product ImagesKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Focus Indicators/Labels

Case Summary

Plaintiff Aishia Petersen, a legally blind individual, has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a luxury jewelry retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on September 22, 2022. The complaint, filed by ACACIA BARROS, P.A., alleges that the retailer's e-commerce platform is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers using screen-reading software.

The lawsuit details several specific WCAG violations that impede accessibility. These include product images being mislabeled with links or numbers instead of descriptive alt text, duplicate IDs for images across multiple products, skipped icons (search, bag, customer login, favorites) when navigating with a screen reader due to lack of focus and labels, and inaccessible product page elements like "description," "price," and "Add to Bag," preventing the plaintiff from completing a purchase. An expert identified 18 unique issue-barriers under WCAG.

This legal action highlights the ongoing risk for businesses operating e-commerce platforms that fail to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Companies with inaccessible websites face potential lawsuits, requiring significant investment in remediation, legal fees, and reputational damage. Ensuring digital accessibility is crucial for all public accommodations to provide equal access to goods and services for individuals with disabilities.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this luxury jewelry retailer accused of?

The luxury jewelry retailer is accused of product images being mislabeled with links or numbers instead of descriptive alt text, duplicate IDs for images, skipped icons (search, bag, customer login, favorites) due to lack of focus and labels, and inaccessible product page elements such as "description," "price," and "Add to Bag" preventing purchase completion.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

This lawsuit was filed by Aishia Petersen, a visually-impaired and legally blind individual, represented by the law firm ACACIA BARROS, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case demonstrates the legal risk for e-commerce businesses if their websites are not fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, potentially leading to lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief, and the necessity to update and maintain digital platforms to comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Luxury Jewelry Retailer. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer