Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fashion Brand

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 22, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: ACACIA BARROS, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible Pop-up Dialogs

Case Summary

Aishia Petersen, a legally blind individual, has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on September 22, 2022, against an online fashion shoe retailer. Represented by Acacia Barros, P.A., the plaintiff alleges that the retailer's e-commerce website is not fully or equally accessible to blind and visually impaired consumers, thereby violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA).

The complaint details multiple specific WCAG violations that impede screen-reader software functionality. These include product images lacking descriptive alt text or having duplicate IDs, sub-menu elements being inaccessible via keyboard navigation, and critical features like size, price, and 'Add to Bag' buttons on product pages lacking keyboard focus. Furthermore, pop-up dialog boxes exhibit poor focus management, and the "skip to content" feature does not function correctly, rendering the website mouse-dependent and incompatible with assistive technologies.

This legal action highlights the ongoing risk for online fashion shoe retailers and similar businesses that fail to design, build, and maintain their websites to be fully accessible. Such failures can result in denial of equal access to goods and services for disabled users, leading to ADA Title III lawsuits and demands for injunctive relief to implement necessary accessibility modifications and ensure effective communication.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online fashion shoe retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of product images lacking alt text or having duplicate IDs, sub-menu elements being inaccessible via keyboard, critical features like size and 'Add to Bag' buttons lacking keyboard focus, pop-up dialog boxes having focus management issues, and an ineffective "skip to content" feature.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Aishia Petersen, a visually impaired individual, filed this lawsuit. She is represented by Acacia Barros, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for online fashion shoe retailers and similar businesses of ADA Title III lawsuits, emphasizing the need for websites to be fully accessible to visually impaired users through proper design, keyboard navigation, and screen reader compatibility.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Fashion Brand. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer