Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a seasonal grill restaurant operator

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 26, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Alt TextScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureFocus Order Issues

Case Summary

Windy Lucius, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC, has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against a seasonal grill restaurant operator and its affiliate in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 26, 2022.

The complaint alleges specific WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations impacting visually impaired users. These include Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) where vegetarian icons and related dishes are not announced, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to excessive swipes needed to announce popup button names in reservation widgets, and Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) where date picker dates are not announced. Further violations include Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order) which prevents selection of future dates in reservation forms, and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) where reservation form elements are not built for accessibility and focus exits date picker popups.

This case highlights the ongoing legal risk for online businesses, particularly those in the hospitality sector offering digital services like reservations and online ordering, if their mobile websites fail to meet established accessibility standards. Organizations are obligated under ADA Title III to ensure their digital platforms, even those linked to third-party vendors, provide full and equal access to all users, including those with visual impairments, or face potential litigation and costly remediation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this restaurant chain accused of?

Guideline 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) for unannounced vegetarian icons, Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) for complex button announcements, Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) for unannounced date picker dates, Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order) for issues selecting future dates, and Guideline 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) for poorly built accessibility elements in forms.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

Businesses, especially those in hospitality with online services like reservations and ordering, face significant legal risk under ADA Title III if their digital platforms, including mobile websites and third-party integrations, are not fully accessible to disabled users, potentially leading to lawsuits and mandated accessibility overhauls.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a seasonal grill restaura.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer