Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Mexican Restaurant

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed September 26, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 A Info & Relationships Violation (Menus)WCAG 2.1 A Meaningful Sequence Violation (Content Order)WCAG 2.1 A Focus Order Violation (Popup & Navigation)WCAG 2.1 A Link Purpose (In Context) Violation (Unlabeled Links)WCAG 2.1 AA Multiple Ways Violation (Menu Accessibility)

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online Mexican restaurant and tequila bar platform in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on September 26, 2022. The complaint alleges that the defendant's mobile website is not fully accessible to visually impaired consumers using screen reader software.

The complaint details several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA violations, including Guideline 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to inaccessible menus, an unannounced main menu icon, and an unlabeled search button. Guideline 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) is violated as content, such as wine prices, is not presented in a meaningful order. Guideline 2.4.3 (Focus order) is breached because popups are not announced and require excessive navigation, while Guideline 2.4.4 (Link purpose in context) is violated by unlabeled links (e.g., logo, search icon). Lastly, Guideline 2.4.5 (Multiple Ways) is violated as critical navigation options, including the main menu and search button, are inaccessible.

This action highlights the significant legal risks for businesses in the restaurant and hospitality industry that operate mobile websites without ensuring full accessibility for disabled users. Failure to comply with WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA standards can lead to similar litigation seeking injunctive relief, attorney's fees, and demands for comprehensive digital accessibility overhauls.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant accused of?

The online restaurant is accused of violating WCAG 2.1 Guidelines, including 1.3.1 (Info and Relationships) due to inaccessible menus and unlabeled elements; 1.3.2 (Meaningful Sequence) with content not presented logically; 2.4.3 (Focus order) as popups are not announced and require excessive navigation; 2.4.4 (Link purpose in context) due to unlabeled links; and 2.4.5 (Multiple Ways) as critical navigation elements like the main menu icon and search button are inaccessible.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit creates a legal risk for other online restaurant and hospitality businesses that fail to ensure their mobile websites are accessible to visually impaired individuals, potentially leading to ADA Title III litigation and demands for injunctive relief and attorney's fees if WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA standards are not met.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Mexican Restaurant. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer