Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing and Accessories Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 14, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AALabels or Instructions (3.3.2)Keyboard (2.1.1)Error Identification (3.3.1)Focus Order (2.4.3)Missing Alt Text on Product ImagesScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff Arantza Espinoza filed this ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on October 14, 2022, against an online clothing and accessories retailer.

The complaint alleges several WCAG violations, including discount codes not being rendered in an audible format, filter buttons having blank audible labels, missing image descriptions for graphic links, generic audible labels for buttons like 'Add to wish list,' an inability to pick color and size through a keyboard interface, an unlabeled mechanism for increasing product quantity, and error messages not rendered in an audible format for incorrect discount codes or missing product selections. Additionally, the size chart functionality was found to lack keyboard operability focus, preventing navigation.

This lawsuit highlights that online retailers selling clothing, accessories, and home goods may face significant legal risks under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act if their e-commerce platforms are not fully accessible to visually impaired users who rely on screen reader software and keyboard navigation.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online clothing and accessories retailer accused of?

The complaint alleges violations including discount codes not being audibly rendered, filter buttons having blank audible labels, missing image descriptions for product links, generic button labels, keyboard operability failures for color/size selection and size charts, unclear labels for quantity controls, and error messages not being audibly rendered for incorrect discount codes or missing product selections.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Arantza Espinoza filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case underscores the legal imperative for digital platforms to ensure full accessibility for disabled users, particularly those with visual impairments. Businesses with similar online operations, especially in e-commerce, risk facing ADA Title III litigation and significant costs if their websites fail to comply with WCAG standards, leading to a denial of equal access to goods and services.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Clothing and Ac.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer