Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online luxury goods retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 14, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 AAMissing Audible LabelsNo Skip to ContentDisruptive Focus OrderInaccessible Error Identification

Case Summary

ARANTZA ESPINOZA has filed a federal lawsuit against an online luxury goods retailer in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on October 14, 2022. The complaint alleges violations of Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) due to the inaccessibility of the retailer's website to visually impaired individuals.

The lawsuit specifically cites multiple WCAG 2.1 AA violations. These include the complimentary offer lacking audible explanation and an unlabeled close button (3.3.2 Labels or Instructions), main navigation links labeled as blank or clickable landmark banner buttons (3.3.2 Labels or Instructions), absence of a skip-to-content mechanism (2.4.1 Bypass Blocks), disruptive pop-up modals and shifted focus order (2.4.3 Focus Order), unlabeled quantity adjustment buttons (3.3.2 Labels or Instructions), and an unannounced focus shift after adding items to the bag with improper navigation for checkout (2.4.3 Focus Order). Additionally, input errors for gift card information are not audibly described to the user (3.3.1 Error Identification).

This case highlights the significant legal exposure for other online luxury goods retailers and e-commerce platforms that fail to ensure their digital properties are fully accessible to users with disabilities. Businesses operating similar websites should proactively audit their platforms for WCAG compliance to mitigate the risk of ADA Title III litigation and ensure equal access for all customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online luxury goods retailer accused of?

The website is accused of lacking audible explanations for complimentary offers and close buttons, having unlabeled navigation links, no skip-to-content mechanism, disruptive focus order with pop-up modals and post-add-to-bag navigation, unlabeled quantity buttons, and non-audible input error descriptions.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

ARANTZA ESPINOZA filed this lawsuit, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC, and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for other online luxury goods retailers, highlighting the importance of ensuring their websites comply with WCAG 2.1 AA standards to avoid similar ADA Title III lawsuits regarding digital accessibility for visually impaired users.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online luxury goods re.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer