Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Apparel and Footwear Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed October 28, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A., Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.A.

WCAG 2.0 AA ComplianceMislabeled Buttons and LinksScreen Reader IncompatibilityForm Field AccessibilityUnlabeled Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online apparel and footwear retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on October 28, 2022. The complaint alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website contains numerous accessibility barriers, preventing blind and visually disabled individuals from accessing and utilizing its services equally. The plaintiff seeks declaratory and injunctive relief, attorney's fees, costs, and litigation expenses under both the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Rehabilitation Act.

The complaint specifically details several critical WCAG violations found on the website. These include mislabeled "Return to home page" and "Shopping cart" buttons, unlabeled submenus, and product images that are incorrectly labeled as "link." Furthermore, the lawsuit highlights mislabeled "sold out" sizes as "radio button non selected disabled 1 of 10" within the shoes section, and improperly labeled sales item prices, making it impossible to distinguish sale prices from original prices. The website also reportedly lacks essential prompting information for online forms and an "accessibility" policy or contact information for disabled users.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risks faced by online retailers whose websites fail to adhere to digital accessibility standards, particularly WCAG 2.0 Level AA. Businesses operating e-commerce platforms must ensure their digital properties provide full and equal access to all users, including those with visual disabilities who rely on screen reader software. Failure to implement accessible design and features can lead to litigation, costly remediation, and a denial of services, privileges, and advantages to a protected class, impacting reputation and market reach.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online apparel and footwear retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of several WCAG violations, including mislabeled home page and shopping cart buttons, unlabeled submenus, and product images incorrectly tagged as "link." Additionally, sold out sizes in the shoes section are mislabeled, and sales item prices are not properly identified, making it difficult to discern discounts. The website also lacks necessary prompting information for online forms and a dedicated accessibility policy.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firms represent the plaintiff?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit. He is represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

, P.

and Law Office of Pelayo Duran, P.

What legal risk does this create for similar online businesses?

This lawsuit indicates that online businesses, especially e-commerce platforms, are at risk of ADA Title III litigation if their websites do not meet accessibility standards like WCAG 2.0 Level A

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An Online Apparel and Foo.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer