Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online footwear and apparel retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 1, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMissing Programmatic LabelsKeyboard Navigation FailureInaccessible Text ContentScreen Reader Incompatibility

Case Summary

VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on November 1, 2022, against an online footwear and apparel retailer. The complaint alleges that the retailer's website fails to provide equal access for visually disabled individuals.

The lawsuit details multiple accessibility barriers on the e-commerce website, including pop-up windows not properly labeled, an unlabeled home page, and mislabeled product prices, such as 'dollar two-fifty tree point zero zero' instead of $253.00. Keyboard navigation is also reported as ineffective for accessing prices, and shoe sizes are read without descriptive context. The complaint further highlights inaccessible text within the size guide and mislabeled elements like the 'x' button for closing windows. Additionally, the website lacks a dedicated accessibility notice or policy, specialized customer assistance for visually disabled users, and has not implemented a web accessibility policy, committee, coordinator, user testing group, bug fix priority policy, or automated web accessibility testing program, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This action underscores the significant legal risks faced by online retailers and public accommodations that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, as mandated by ADA Title III. Businesses operating similar e-commerce websites must proactively implement robust accessibility measures, including screen reader compatibility and keyboard navigation, to avoid potential lawsuits, ensure equal access, and comply with federal regulations.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online footwear and apparel retailer accused of?

The online footwear and apparel retailer is accused of numerous WCAG violations, including inaccessible pop-up windows and home page, mislabeled product prices (e.g., 'dollar two-fifty tree point zero zero' instead of $253.00), keyboard navigation failures for prices, and lack of descriptive context for shoe sizes. The complaint also notes inaccessible text within the size guide and the absence of an accessibility policy, coordinator, or testing procedures.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the ongoing legal exposure for businesses with websites that do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG standards. Companies in the retail sector, particularly those with an online presence, face legal challenges if their digital platforms exclude disabled users, necessitating comprehensive accessibility audits and remediation efforts.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online footwear and ap.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer