Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online restaurant service

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 9, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC

WCAG 2.1 AANon-Text Content (1.1.1)Focus Order (2.4.3)Labels or Instructions (3.3.2)NameRoleValue (4.1.2)

Case Summary

Plaintiff Windy Lucius filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida, Miami Division on November 9, 2022, alleging that an online restaurant service's mobile website discriminates against visually impaired users under ADA Title III.

The complaint specifically details several WCAG 2.1 Level A and AA Guideline violations, including a failure to provide non-text content for unlabeled elements (Guideline 1.1.1), incorrect focus order that prevents screen reader users from interacting with forms (Guideline 2.4.3), missing labels or instructions for key interactive elements like menu icons (Guideline 3.3.2), and improper naming, roles, and values for form fields, such as phone number inputs (Guideline 4.1.2). These issues render the mobile website inaccessible to individuals using VoiceOver screen reader software.

This case highlights the significant legal risk for businesses, particularly those in the hospitality industry operating online ordering and reservation systems, if their digital platforms fail to meet established accessibility standards. Organizations with similar online services must ensure their mobile websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities to avoid potential lawsuits, injunctive relief, and the considerable costs associated with attorney's fees and litigation expenses under the Americans with Disabilities Act.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online restaurant service accused of?

The mobile website is accused of violating WCAG 1.1.1 (Non-Text Content) due to unlabeled graphics, 2.4.3 (Focus Order) which prevents screen reader users from selecting dates or accessing popups, 3.3.2 (Labels or Instructions) as main menu icons are unlabeled, and 4.1.2 (Name, Role, Value) because form fields like phone numbers are not properly labeled.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Windy Lucius filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm J. Courtney Cunningham, PLLC.

What legal risk does this create?

This case creates legal risk for online restaurant services that operate mobile websites without full accessibility, potentially leading to ADA Title III lawsuits, demands for injunctive relief to remediate accessibility barriers, and significant attorney's fees and litigation costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: An online restaurant serv.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer