Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online beauty product retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 18, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AA FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible Product PricingUnlabeled Shopping Cart ElementsMissing Labels

Case Summary

Plaintiff Nelson Fernandez has filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court Southern District of Florida on November 18, 2022, against an online beauty product retailer. The plaintiff, a visually impaired individual, alleges that the defendant's e-commerce website is inaccessible to blind and visually disabled users who rely on screen reader software.

The complaint specifies several WCAG violations, including inaccessible product pricing, a company telephone number lacking a proper description, mislabeled abbreviations (such as "oz") for product details, unlabeled item price, subtotal, and shipping costs within the shopping cart, and promotional text that is not labeled for screen reader integration. Furthermore, the plaintiff asserts that the online beauty product retailer has failed to establish a web accessibility policy, appoint a web accessibility coordinator, implement accessibility testing groups or bug fix policies, or conduct automated web accessibility testing, thereby failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

This lawsuit underscores the significant legal risk for businesses, particularly online retailers with a nexus to physical stores, if their websites do not comply with ADA Title III and WCAG guidelines. Companies that fail to provide equal access to their digital platforms for individuals with disabilities may face demands for injunctive relief to remediate their websites, along with potential liability for attorney's fees and costs.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online beauty product retailer accused of?

The online beauty product retailer is accused of having inaccessible product pricing, an improperly described telephone number, mislabeled abbreviations for product information, unlabeled item price, subtotal, and shipping costs in the shopping cart, and unlabeled promotional text, all contributing to a failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Nelson Fernandez filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This creates a legal risk for e-commerce businesses, especially those connected to physical stores, highlighting the necessity of ensuring their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities, or face potential ADA Title III lawsuits, injunctive relief, and legal expenses.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online beauty product .... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer