Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a retail jewelry chain

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 23, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityMissing Alt TextKeyboard Navigation FailureMislabeled Elements

Case Summary

Plaintiff Nelson Fernandez, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Esq., P.A., filed a lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on November 23, 2022. The complaint alleges that a prominent retail jewelry chain's e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually disabled individuals, violating Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) and the Palm Beach County Code.

The lawsuit specifically details several critical web accessibility barriers. These include the absence of clear distinctions between sale and actual prices, mislabeled camera icons for uploading pictures, incorrect abbreviations such as 'k' for karat and 'oz' for ounces, and inaccessible item price, subtotal, shipping cost, and total within the shopping cart. Furthermore, gallery pictures are mislabeled, the 'contact us' text is misread by screen readers as 'contact u, s.', and category images are ambiguously labeled as 'space'. These issues prevent effective communication and full use of the website by visually impaired users relying on screen reader software.

This case underscores the continuous legal risk faced by online retailers whose websites fail to adhere to established accessibility guidelines like WCAG 2.0 Level AA. Businesses offering goods and services, particularly those with a strong online presence linked to physical stores, must ensure their digital platforms provide equal access to all individuals, including those with visual disabilities. Failure to implement reasonable modifications and auxiliary aids can result in injunctive relief, damages, and significant legal fees.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this retail jewelry chain accused of?

The retail jewelry chain is accused of having no clear distinction between sale and actual prices, mislabeled camera icons and gallery pictures, incorrect abbreviations, inaccessible shopping cart details, and screen reader misinterpretations of text and image labels.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

Nelson Fernandez filed this lawsuit, represented by Roderick V. Hannah, Es

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk for online businesses, especially those with a nexus to physical stores, of violating ADA Title III by maintaining websites that are inaccessible to visually disabled users, potentially leading to injunctive relief and monetary penalties.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: a retail jewelry chain. Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer