Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and accessories retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed November 23, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAScreen Reader IncompatibilityKeyboard Navigation FailureMissing Labels/Alt TextPop-up Window Accessibility

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A., has filed a federal lawsuit in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on November 23, 2022, against an online apparel and accessories retailer. The complaint alleges unlawful disability discrimination under Title III of the Americans with Disabilities Act, stemming from the inaccessibility of the retailer's website to visually impaired users.

The complaint details several critical web accessibility barriers encountered by Mr. Ariza using screen reader software. These violations include a mislabeled home page button/company logo, an inaccessible sign-in button when navigating with a keyboard, and inaccessible text for banner links such as "Shop Girls" and "Shop Boys." Furthermore, while navigating products, only the product name is read, with price and details remaining inaccessible. A pop-up window for a 15% off offer also impedes navigation, as it remains open while the cursor moves in the background. The plaintiff also notes the absence of an accessibility notice or policy page, and generally asserts that the website fails to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher standards.

This litigation highlights the significant legal exposure for e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their digital platforms are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Companies operating online retail stores, especially those with brick-and-mortar locations that provide connected services through their websites, face a heightened risk of ADA Title III lawsuits if they do not adhere to established web accessibility guidelines such as WCAG. Ensuring comprehensive digital accessibility is crucial to avoid claims of discrimination and to provide equal access to all potential customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this apparel and accessories retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of having a mislabeled home page button/company logo, an inaccessible sign-in button for keyboard navigation, inaccessible text before banner links, and product prices and details that are not readable by screen readers. Additionally, a pop-up window obstructs navigation, and the website lacks an accessibility notice or policy, failing to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit demonstrates the ongoing legal risk for e-commerce businesses, particularly those with physical stores offering integrated online services, if their websites are not digitally accessible. Failure to comply with web accessibility standards like WCAG can lead to ADA Title III litigation, requiring costly remediation and legal fees.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an apparel and accessorie.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer