Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online shoe and accessory retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 5, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A.

WCAG 2.1 Level A ComplianceAudible Error Identification FailureMissing Link LabelsKeyboard Navigation IssuesIncorrect Focus Order

Case Summary

Plaintiff ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.A., has filed an ADA Title III lawsuit against an online shoe and accessory retailer in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida on December 5, 2022. The complaint alleges that the e-commerce website is inaccessible to visually impaired users, preventing full and equal enjoyment of its digital services.

The lawsuit details multiple WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including missing audible error identification for email sign-up, promo code, gift card, and credit card entry errors (Standard 3.3.1). Other significant barriers involve unlabeled graphic links for shipping/currency changes and filter controls (Standard 3.3.2), keyboard operability failures in search functionality and credit card input (Standard 2.1.1), lack of a skip-to-content mechanism (Standard 2.4.1), and incorrect focus order when adding items to a shopping bag (Standard 2.4.3).

This action highlights the ongoing legal risks faced by e-commerce businesses that fail to ensure their websites are fully accessible to individuals with disabilities. Similar online retailers are advised to conduct thorough accessibility audits to avoid potential ADA Title III lawsuits, ensure compliance with WCAG standards, and provide equal access to all customers.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online shoe and accessory retailer accused of?

The retailer is accused of several WCAG 2.1 Level A violations, including a lack of audible error identification for various input fields (email, promo code, gift card, credit card), unlabeled graphic links (shipping/currency, filters), keyboard navigation issues (search, credit card input), missing skip-to-content functionality, and incorrect focus order in the shopping bag process.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

The lawsuit was filed by ALEJANDRO ESPINOZA, and he is represented by Mendez Law Offices, PLLC and Adams & Associates, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This case signifies a continuing legal vulnerability for e-commerce platforms, particularly online retailers, that have not fully embraced digital accessibility. Businesses that operate websites failing to meet WCAG standards risk similar ADA Title III lawsuits, potentially leading to injunctive relief and legal costs.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: an online shoe and access.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer