Received a Demand Letter? Get Immediate Defense Help →

Informational only — not legal advice. Data from public PACER/CourtListener records. Full disclaimer →

ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Beauty Supply Retailer

Case # · District Court, S.D. Florida · Filed December 14, 2022

Plaintiff's Firm: RODERICK V. HANNAH, ESQ., P.A.

WCAG 2.0 Level AAMislabeled ImagesKeyboard Navigation FailureScreen Reader IncompatibilityInaccessible Shopping Cart

Case Summary

Plaintiff VICTOR ARIZA has filed an ADA Title III website accessibility lawsuit in the United States District Court, Southern District of Florida, on December 14, 2022, against an online beauty supply retailer. The plaintiff, who is blind and uses screen reader software, alleges that the defendant's website contains numerous accessibility barriers preventing full and equal access to its goods, services, and information.

The alleged WCAG violations include: some parts of the site remaining in Spanish despite English selection, mislabeled product images, inaccessible prices when navigating with a keyboard, lack of notification for actions in the shopping cart, inaccessible item pricing and subtotal in the cart, and a general failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA standards or higher. Furthermore, the complaint asserts the absence of an accessibility notice, policy, or statement, and a lack of essential features like alt-text for graphics and full keyboard operability.

This case highlights the critical legal risk for online beauty supply retailers and other e-commerce businesses that fail to provide accessible digital platforms. Compliance with ADA Title III and Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) is essential to ensure effective communication and equal access for all users, thereby mitigating the risk of similar lawsuits and ensuring an inclusive online experience.

Case Q&A

What specific WCAG violations is this online beauty supply retailer accused of?

The online beauty supply retailer is accused of having website sections in Spanish despite English selection, mislabeled product images, inaccessible prices via keyboard navigation, missing shopping cart notifications, inaccessible cart pricing, and a general failure to meet WCAG 2.0 Level AA or higher, along with missing accessibility policies and basic accessibility features like alt-text and keyboard operability.

Who filed this lawsuit, and which law firm?

VICTOR ARIZA filed this lawsuit, represented by the law firm RODERICK V. HANNAH, ES

, P.

(with LAW OFFICE OF PELAYO DURAN, P.

What legal risk does this create?

This lawsuit highlights the legal risk that businesses, particularly online retailers, face if their websites are not fully accessible to disabled users under ADA Title III and WCAG standards, potentially leading to further litigation and injunctions.

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

AI · Powered by TDARI database + Gemini

Online

TDARI Legal Intel Assistant

I'm analyzing ADA Website Accessibility Lawsuit: Online Beauty Supply Reta.... Ask me about the plaintiff's law firm, the specific WCAG violations at risk, or how to protect your business. I cite real lawsuit patterns — not generic advice.

Not legal advice — informational intelligence only.

TDARI is not a law firm. Responses are AI-generated intelligence, not legal advice. Disclaimer